About Me

Name: Larry Gee
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

The FLDS and Freedom Of Religion

I've watched with some interest the goings on with the Fundamentalist Church of Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints in Texas, and I'd like to express my support for their plight.  You see, I believe that as long as you are not harming anyone, you should be able to practice whatever religion you choose, as guaranteed by the first amendment to our constitution.  We, as a people tolerate such varied religious practices as Satanism, complete atheism, Voodoo, along with more "main stream" religions such as Catholicism, Evangelist Christianity, Islam (which also practices polygamy), Buddism, Hinduism, and a whole raft of others not mentioned.  We tolerate, and even look with some fondness on the Amish and Mennonite communities.

I guess in the whole "why can't we all get along" theme, what harm are these people doing to others?  Why does the state of Texas feel that they are responsible for 'saving' these children from their religion?  Is polygamy equivalent to child abuse?  These people seem healthy, well dressed, and clean.  They appear to have more than the basics of the food, and shelter covered, so why mess with them?

I suppose it is our discomfort with their alleged practice of 'forced' marriage of young girls to older men.  We find it shocking and somewhat unbelievable how in today's society that this could be going on.  Thing is, the FLDS members aren't really a part of our society.  They have chosen to live apart and to have minimal interaction with our society as a whole.  Practices that cause us to swallow hard and raise our eyebrows may seem as normal as rain to them.

Now, I'll have to admit that I'm not really comfortable with the alleged practice of child marriage.  I can't imagine marrying off my teenage daughter to some old codger, even one I might be friends with.  I'm the law and order type, so on principle, I should be coming down hard on the side of the state of Texas, but I still have reservations about how the freedom of religion is being trampled here.  I guess that with a single modification to the FLDS practices, my squeamishness would vanish.  That change would be, marriages shall not be granted until both parties are over the age of 18, which is the minimum age for marriage in Texas, without a court order.  Now, having said that, I'm in no position to modify the doctrine or practices of the FLDS church.  Maybe the authorities in Texas are, but why stop there?  Why not force them to give up the practice of polygamy all together?  Ah, there in lies the rub.  The state is then infringing on the first amendment rights.  The state of Texas could be guilty of what is religious persecution.  I'm sure the members of the FLDS church see it that way.

So, what is my final word?  I guess I'm going to have to come down on the side of the first amendment.  Hands off the FLDS church.  Send the over 400 children back to their parents.  I would however warn the leaders of that community that child abuse will not be tolerated and suggest that their marriage practices be modified to raise the minimum age of marriage to be consistent with the laws in the state of Texas, then, leave them alone.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

In Defense of a Pre-Emptive Strikes against Iran

I heard this morning on one of the drive in talk radio shows that there is a contingent of people who are trying to get a commitment out of Senator McCain that he will not make preemptive strikes against Iran.  The philosophy is that the US should never be the aggressor and only fight from a defensive position.  That way the US won't be evil.  That we are only responding to aggression.

OK.  I get it.  I suppose I can live with that philosophy.  I just have one question that I want answered.

Which city in the US or world gets sacrificed in the christening ceremony of Iran's Nuclear Jihad before we respond?

Let's look at a likely set of candidates.

New York.  This is an easy one.  Lots of people closely populated for maximizing body count.  Much of the wealth is concentrated there, so the impact to world financial markets will be magnified.  I'd miss New York though, so if we knew New York was imminently targeted and the missile was 2 minutes from being launched, would that justify a preemptive strike?

How about say.... Chicago, Miami or Los Angeles.  Maybe Dallas, Denver or Seattle?  What about something a little more out of the way like, say.... Detroit, Portland, Wichita or Cleveland.  Let's for a moment expand our world view a bit.  How about London, Paris, Madrid, Berlin, Warsaw, Moscow, Mumbai, Tokyo, Beijing or even some place that Iran already has in their sights, Tel Aviv?  Which of these gets to have a mushroom cloud over it? 

I have the perfect solution.... San Francisco.  Let's all agree to sacrifice San Francisco.  Nobody will mind.  Here, I'll even help you a form letter so send to Ahmadinejad.

Dear Mr. Ahmadinejad,
Thank you for assuring us that your nuclear program only has peaceful applications.  However, we are worried that you aren't really telling us the whole truth and are building a nuclear arsenal along with your reactors.  We just have a request that when you decide to test your new and improved nuclear bombs, that you are very careful when you choose a target.  We wouldn't want too many people we know and love to get hurt.  So, since we know you need to make a statement, We the American People have decided to sacrifice the city of San Francisco to the cause of jihad.  We've warned all of our loved ones to move to Tulsa, Billings and Duluth in preparation for your demonstration.

Oh, you won't need to make more than two bombs, so save your money.  Your point will be made.  The spineless, weak kneed, lily livered, yellow bellied politicians of this country will immediately be at your side begging you not to detonate the other bomb in exchange for whatever you want, so have your wish list ready. 

Sincerely,

Joe or Sally American

So, once again I ask, who will get sacrificed in order to soothe our conscience?


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »